In which scenario would you use inductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning is used to form generalizations based on specific observations or examples. In the scenario of validating a hypothesis based on observations, one collects data or evidence and uses that information to draw broader conclusions. This is a key aspect of scientific inquiry, where repeated observations lead to the formulation of theories or hypotheses. Through this process, you begin with particular instances and, from them, generate a more general understanding.

In contrast, solving a problem with direct logic is more aligned with deductive reasoning, which involves applying general rules to reach specific conclusions. Exploring a creative approach to a problem may involve divergent thinking rather than the systematic approach seen in inductive reasoning. Similarly, providing a sequential solution typically relies on established methods and logical steps, which again doesn't emphasize the pattern recognition and generalization that are hallmarks of inductive reasoning. Therefore, the option involving the validation of a hypothesis accurately describes when one would employ inductive reasoning.