Which strategy involves comparing a problem to something familiar to draw on existing knowledge?

Choosing to solve a problem by analogy relies on the technique of comparing the new problem to a previously encountered situation that is similar. This strategy allows individuals to leverage their existing knowledge and experiences, making it easier to understand and navigate the new challenge. When drawing parallels between problems, one can identify patterns, solutions, or approaches that were effective in the past and apply them to the current situation.

This method is highly valuable because it streamlines the problem-solving process, enabling quicker insights and fostering creative solutions by bridging gaps in understanding through familiarity. It can be particularly useful in fields where conceptual transfer is beneficial, such as science, mathematics, or even everyday decision-making.

In contrast, the other strategies listed involve different problem-solving approaches. Means-End Analysis focuses on breaking down a problem into smaller, manageable parts and determining the necessary steps to reach the desired outcome. Lateral Thinking emphasizes generating creative solutions through unconventional methods that might not immediately seem related to the problem at hand. Inductive Reasoning draws general conclusions from specific instances. While all are vital techniques, solving by analogy specifically emphasizes using familiar scenarios to simplify and tackle new problems.